Bury boss Kevin Blackwell slams Grimsby Town over efforts to keep Marcus Marshall

Trusted article source icon
Friday, January 25, 2013
Profile image for Grimsby Telegraph

Grimsby Telegraph

BURY manager Kevin Blackwell has accused Grimsby Town of being “shoddy” and “underhand” in their efforts to keep hold of Marcus Marshall.

Earlier this week, the Shakers recalled the winger from his season-long loan with the Mariners after accepting a bid for his services from Luton Town.

  1. FURY: Bury manager Kevin Blackwell.

    FURY: Bury manager Kevin Blackwell.

However, Blackwell has now revealed that they are currently in dispute with the Football League over a 24-hour recall clause that was inserted into the winger’s loan contract when he linked up with Town.

In a fiery interview with his club’s official website, Blackwell criticised League officials who have ruled that the clause is not permitted under its rules.

BLINDS & CURTAINS MADE 2 MEASURE WE COVER SCUNTHORPE & GRIMSBY...

Grimsby Sunblinds

View details

Print voucher

FREE MEASURING AND FITTING SERVICE PHONE809887 FOR A FREE QUOTE www.grimsby-sunblinds.co.uk

Contact: 01472 809887

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

Therefore, the League One strugglers are unable to recall Marshall from his stay in Cleethorpes, meaning the 23-year-old could be set for a Blundell Park return.

He said: “We don’t know what’s happening with Marcus Marshall at the moment. There is a disagreement between ourselves and the Football League over the registration of Marcus.

“The Football League have said that there was a 24-hour recall clause in his loan contract to Grimsby that shouldn’t have been in there, but it’s news to me.

“They’re saying he may not be able to come back and play for Bury, so we’re trying to get that clarified.”

Blackwell was scathing of the Mariners’ role in the transfer wrangle.

He continued: “I’m very angry about the situation and the way Grimsby have conducted themselves – they’ve been very shoddy about things.

“He’s our player and I’ve got Grimsby Town Football Club deciding who, where and what is going on.

“It’s the underhand nature with which they’ve done it.

“When we called him back, everyone accepted it.

“But then Grimsby find out that it’s Luton Town who have put the bid in and then decide they want to fight it.

“I believe they’ve had a bit of a spat with Luton and they’ve done everything they could to make sure the kid didn’t go there.

“But football is a small world and what goes around comes around.”

Meanwhile, Town joint boss Paul Hurst, remains hopeful of seeing Marshall in a black and white shirt soon.

He refused to rule out a return for the wide man and even hinted that he could be involved in tomorrow’s clash at Cambridge United.

He said: “I can tell you he won’t be going to Luton, but beyond that, there’s not a lot to say on the matter at this moment in time.

“We’d like Marcus back. Things are going off in the background and you always have to be hopeful.

“It would be a huge boost if we had him in for the weekend. He’s had a big impact on the club since joining and made an important contribution.

“The last two or three games that we played, he was arguably our best player and I think he’s really grown in confidence while he’s been here.

“I think he’s disappointed that he wasn’t able to play on Tuesday because of what’s happening and he wants to be with us.

“It works for us and it works for Marcus and hopefully he will be back in a Grimsby Town shirt soon.”

Meanwhile, Blackwell continued his rant at the powers-that-be.

“The ineptitude of the FA and their registration rules have allowed a situation to arise that shouldn’t have ever been allowed to arise,” he continued.

“When stuff comes in you’re supposed to check it, aren’t you? And they haven’t done that.

“No-one said anything when it went through, otherwise I wouldn’t have let the lad go because I know that we are short on numbers and later on in the season, we might have needed him.

“I put the clause in to ensure that our club is covered.

“And now they’re telling me that I might not be able to get him back.”

11
Tweet this article
Report

11 Comments

  • Profile image for enfieldmarine

    by enfieldmarine

    Friday, January 25 2013, 8:30PM

    “what is kevin blackwell talking about, we want a 24 clause to recall a player, because we are short of players. so why would you then accept a fee from luton for the same player. Does he have any idea how pathethic he sounds when making these comments. The issue is, he promised Luton the player and tried to be underhand himself, which as backfired. deal with it, and next time check out the rules before accepting a fee from a club to sell him.”

  • Profile image for lee_GTFC1

    by lee_GTFC1

    Friday, January 25 2013, 7:04PM

    “Justice

    UTM”

  • Profile image for pontoonergy

    by pontoonergy

    Friday, January 25 2013, 2:23PM

    “Money again seems to be the ruler here,Blackwell once managed Luton and Buckle is manager now..... little deal was going to happen with Marshy been the little gem and its now gone sour grapes for the two Lutonites...... well hard cheese!!!Marcus we respect you at Grimsby Town,stay with us lad and you will be rewarded in a loyal way.Utmm.”

  • Profile image for 574usfg

    by 574usfg

    Friday, January 25 2013, 11:51AM

    “And another thing, Blackwell, if Scott and Hurst are doing business over a good player to benefit Grimsby Town when we're top with 19 games to go, it's not exactly a shocker, is it?

    AND, I'd sack your legal advisors if I were you.

    Wazzock.”

  • Profile image for kgreen84

    by kgreen84

    Friday, January 25 2013, 10:25AM

    “Blackwell really is a plum, you put a clause in, you call him back, we say 'ok'. We find out Luton and thats not OK and Marcus didn't want to go anyway so end of that conversation. We're playing by the rules now in order to help our promotion ambitions.

    You on the other hand are quite patheic, your crying about this clause becuase it gave you a fall back should you require a body, no problem with that. HOWEVER you recalled him not to be played but to be flogged and so meaning less players for you. As it stands the poor lad is in limbo, your lot are in a sulk and he can't come back here until the FA/Football League tell you to behave and leave him to go about his business.

    On that end you are still a plum”

  • Profile image for adamw1983

    by adamw1983

    Friday, January 25 2013, 10:14AM

    “Firstly, Blackwell, if you knew you were "short on numbers" when Marcus Marshall came to us, then why did you allow him to go in the first place? Secondly, ranting against the FA ("ineptitude") is surely similar to slating a referee (who is an FA employee), which is usually faced with some kind of sanction from the powers that be. Hopefully the FA have read this little hissy and are going to come down on you like a ton of bricks. You pillock!

    Oh, and thirdly, I notice on your Wikipedia page, your listed as being born in LUTON. Clearly all you lot are the same”

  • Profile image for 574usfg

    by 574usfg

    Friday, January 25 2013, 9:22AM

    “"When stuff comes in you're supposed to check it, aren't you?"

    No, mate, YOU'RE supposed to check it before it goes out. If you loan a player, you stick to the rules. You've ballsed it up and you're trying to blame someone else. And our relations with other clubs are none of your business. Intercourse off, Blackwell.”

  • Profile image for Dailyman

    by Dailyman

    Friday, January 25 2013, 9:05AM

    “Blackwell passing the blame as usual. He's been a failure at the majority of clubs he's managed, including Luton coincidentally. It is your and your clubs job to read and understand the FA rules and to adhere to them which you have shown with your ineptitude that you cannot do. Marcus has finally found a club where he is appreciated and where he is able to show his talent off so I'm not surprised he doesn't want to sign for tinpot Luton or stay with Bury who will be relegated this year. Next season Luton will be a distant memory and Bury will be looking up tithe Mighty Mariners. So I suggest Marcus has made the right decision and hopefully he'll be back in black and white before long. UTM”

  • Profile image for ProperGrimbo

    by ProperGrimbo

    Friday, January 25 2013, 8:46AM

    “"shoddy" and "underhand" is writing in a clause that is not within the rules. I didnt think it was possible to recall a player on a season long loan with out mutual consent. Strong words for a mistake Blackwell himself has made. Has he never loaned out a player for a season before?

    UTM”

  • Profile image for Observer_2

    by Observer_2

    Friday, January 25 2013, 8:42AM

    “Blackwell has a duty to Bury FC and their supporters to know the rules of the FA. Under the circumstances he has let his club down and is now trying to blame GTFC. Sackable offence”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article