Cosalt's new £200k deal will power up offshore wind energy plans
GRIMSBY today took another huge step towards becoming the premier operations and maintenance port for the offshore wind energy industry.
As reported on www.thisisgrimsby.co.uk, the Renewables Divison of the town's marine services giant Cosalt has struck a £200,000 deal with Danish engineering firm APRO, initially to provide specialist engineers for Siemens' offshore wind turbines activities.
-

More than 20 new jobs have already been created at the new firm to come out of the deal, Cosalt Wind Energy Ltd, and there is potential for thousands more over the next decade.
Cosalt Wind Energy Ltd, in which Cosalt has an 80 per cent share, will be based at the firm's Europarc head office.
Following the announcement yesterday, shares in Cosalt shot up by eight per cent.
Managing director of Cosalt's Renewables Division, Winston Phillips, said the wind energy market is important for both Cosalt and the Humber region for the future.
He said: "Since we started the dedicated Renewables Division in 2009, we have been actively looking for a joint venture in the renewables market, and APRO have been looking at developing a presence in the UK.
"It is very exciting to be given the opportunity to develop a new business in a growing market.
"We are speaking with several local companies and academic institutes in the area for them to realise the opportunities are there for the future.
"We have already recruited 20 local people who will start work at the end of August.
"Together we can deliver a unique and comprehensive package of services and products to the wind energy market.
"We are also setting up an apprenticeship scheme so that we can develop a large and highly-skilled workforce that will grow with us as we take on more business."
Read more about the new company, plans for the future, and reaction in today's Grimsby Telegraph.












27 Comments
View all
by Blokey Bloke, Clee pub
Saturday, July 31 2010, 5:22PM
“Surreptitious subsidies like the ROC - rip-off-charter - sorry Renewables Obligation Certificates are just what I've re-branded them as - a rip off charter - a legal tool which circumvents the ofgen watchdog ruling to prevent over-charging. The people pushing windpower are mainly from the pious old middle class nuLabour voting types trying to claim the upper moral high ground from new middle-class using the ecology stance. They appear to have a dislike for working classes and lower income groups and really hate it when some under-class types make good - something lottery winner advisors point out when winners want to buy a new posh house - a mate a work had a relative who won stacks and went against the advice only to find out the advisor was right. It is this underlying psychology which makes supporters blind to the high costs of electricity (they can afford it) and condemn the less better off to paying very high bills - a form of schadenfreude. Very nuLabour! So the sneak overpricing is major sociological issue and I hope that it gives readers something to mull over. The spin tactics used for renewables (read wind and Anthropogenic [man-made] global warming AGW) is more or less the same templates used in road tranport and anti-civil-liberty policies. I've been on many Govt projects and some ministerial seminars and it never ceases to amaze me how meglo some policitians, industrialists and civil servants are.
However, there is another more important issue which no-one has commented on - what happens when there's no wind, surely there must be some wind around our island - well may be not. Sorry to remind folks of it again, but it does need answering.
Betz and Cube Law aside, the availability of power generation from wind turbines is very low - intermittent. Sure you can have pumped storage hydraulic accumulators like in Wales, but how much land needs to be flooded and how much £££
As mentioned in my earlier comment, last winter, there was no wind, that's why we had lots of snow - there was a UK wide depression, the isobars were well spaced out. So when we need lots of electrical power (lighting the long nights, heating against cold winter temperatures) wind power was not available - no wind! The previous govt as well as the present haven't gone public with this and the likes of BWEA have been pretty much tight lipped along with other pro-wind power fans. Trawling through previous posts here and on other News blogs, no-one has twigged that the emporor has no clothes on.
At any given time the UK generates around 80GW, with an average useage of 60GW. The availability factor is around 10 % for offshore and 3 % for onshore wind farms below 600 m ASL and 10 % for turbines above 600 m ASL An average big off-shore wind turbine has a 2MW output. Wind turbine at Conisholme 800 kW, I'll be generous, round it up to 1MW. The Dinorwig Power Station ~2GW pumped-storage hydroelectric. Large coal fired station o/p is ~4GW, current nuclear ~1 GW, proposed new nuclear stations, ~3GW. Sizewell B is the most available, 2 years between refuelling. Something different from Sudoku n Crossword puzzle.”
by josephine white, Grimsby
Saturday, July 31 2010, 8:37AM
“Good informative comments Blokey Bloke, thanks.
Your point about 'subsidies' is one which is usually glossed over .. and as a regular poster mentioned recently on another thread - If Wind farms are as economically viable as the Greens would have us believe, why isn't the private sector building them?”
by PH, Immingham
Friday, July 30 2010, 3:03PM
“Just to add to TH GY. turbine accident list.
Mar 2010 East Renfrewshire 150ft blade snapped off a turbine.
Dec 2009 Norfolk School wind turbine collapses and crushes van
Feb 2009 Conisholme, Lincolnshire 65 ft blade that flew off
Jan 2008 Cumbria wind turbine total collapse”
by Blokey Bloke, Dungeness and Grimsby
Friday, July 30 2010, 2:26PM
“The problem with off shore windfarms is that it take a long time to recover the embedded carbon energy that goes into producing them. They need to be running for twenty plus years which is the average service life for such machines and that is assuming very high availability. The availability of power generation from wind turbines is low and therefore further development of these should be phased out in favour in biomass combine heat and generator stations as well as nuclear. As mentioned in my earlier comment, last winter, there was no wind, that's why we had lots of snow. So when we need lots of electrical power (lighting the long nights, heating against cold winter temperatures) wind power was not available. The previous govt as well as the present haven't gone public with this and the likes of BWEA have been pretty much tight lipped along with other pro-wind power fans (pun not intended).
Most nuclear waste in UK is stored in a disused mine at Drigg, Cumbria, and this is mostly comprised of low level radioactive material from clothing, tools, machinery as well as hospital material. On AGR stations, spent fuel is stored in vaults at the station. The fuel is not in metal form but in oxide form - an insoluble ceramic, very stable and easy to store. Uranium and even plutonium are found in the ground and there are such things as naturally occuring reactors in Africa, but you get more hazards from disused asbestos open cast mines left by US owned firms - and they moan at BP.
House prices around Dungeness are disproportionately higher than surrounding settlements. There are lot of folks from the arts/media world and this pushes the prices up.
Uranium has other uses apart from fuel. Its been used as a glass colourant for centuries.
The attitude around south Kent is much different than Lincs, they like the stations since it brings lots of highly-skilled and well paid work with long term security. Even when decommissioned, it still employs people with regular long term work. And even with this cost, which is not subsidised, its still cheaper than wind. Eon have acknowledged that wind power can only be commercially viable with subsidies and wouldn't build them if the subsidies did not exist. E.on in fact are looking into new coal fired stations, I just wonder how much of it will be built in UK.”
by Neil, Cleethorpes
Thursday, July 29 2010, 9:16PM
“I suppose you could add to the list,a very surprised cow,sheep or fish.....It will still not be a huge problem (unless you were the surprised cow,sheep or fish) to repair the windmills. Nuclear power plants tend to be a leetle more difficult.....”