Duchess of Cambridge baby 'slip-up': St James' Palace silent on whether Kate is relieved issue has been resolved
OFFICIALS at St James’ Palace have refused to comment on whether the Duchess of Cambridge is relieved the issue of whether or not she let slip that she was having a daughter has finally been resolved.
As reported, the Grimsby Telegraph posted exclusive video footage from that supposed "slip of the tongue" moment at www.thisisgrimsby.co.uk– which showed that she definitely didn’t say the "d word".
-
The Duchess of Cambridge during her trip to the Fishing Heritage Centre in Grimsby. Picture: Duncan Young
MAYFAIR ESTATE AGENTS
If we cannot find you a tenant within one month, we will find you one for FREE, yes FREE, you will pay no fees.
Contact 01472 355553
Terms: Terms and Conditions Apply
Contact: 01472 355 553
Valid until: Friday, May 24 2013
It shows the Duchess of Cambridge accepting a teddy from Diane Burton, saying: "Oh is that for us? Thank you very much, that is very sweet of you."
The video – which can be viewed below – put a stop to the rumours splashed across the world's media after Sandra Cook, of Grimsby, who was next to Diane in the crowd, was reported as claiming to overhear the Duchess saying: "Thank you, I will take that for my d..."
Our footage was captured by royalist Lisa Hewson, 32, of Healing, who was standing between Sandra and Diane in the crowds outside the Heritage Fishing Centre.
Lisa, an insurance worker, had secretly hoped to get a reaction from the Duchess.
Speaking at the time she said: "I hope Kate may see this and think there are some decent people who want the best for her.
"Maybe she might send me a little note or even an MBE, although I think that might be doubtful!"
13 Comments
View all
by tarkley
Sunday, March 17 2013, 12:23PM
“are you STILL going on about this?”
by tarkley
Sunday, March 17 2013, 12:22PM
“are you STILL going on about this?”
by lawrence61
Saturday, March 16 2013, 3:21PM
“How embarrasing!!! You called The Palace??!!!! Really??!!! Should be ashamed of yourselves. Probably wont get another Royal visit again after the GT's handling of this. No dignity whatsoever.”
by fuertegaz
Saturday, March 16 2013, 8:53AM
“This was a non story at the begining,a non story last week and should be dead by now.For gods sake let it go. No one cares”
by davendogs
Saturday, March 16 2013, 8:45AM
“I see the red lipstick merchant has woken up.
Greenblob, who was Zee? I don't recall.”
by greenblob
Saturday, March 16 2013, 8:14AM
“by davendogs - Saturday, March 16 2013, 7:11AM
John Norton was a up and coming, need more like him. I wonder what happened to him."
Probably went the same way as 'Zee', now that's a blast from the past. smile.”
by calypso
Saturday, March 16 2013, 7:41AM
“It seem the GT are deaf to criticisms. It just blunders on.
What a cheap and tacky publication this has become.”
by davendogs
Saturday, March 16 2013, 7:31AM
“Here we go again. Error, comment could not be... does not support this property or method.
Please do endeavour to smarten up GT. I don't purchase the paper version myself, its not worth it. I receive it second hand. I think you are well aware of the purpose I put it to, rather fitting.”
by davendogs
Saturday, March 16 2013, 7:12AM
“Could be a case of burying other articles in the back pages. The paper version is at the newsagents for 5am, printed out of town, I think it is Leicester. At best the news is yesterday or beyond. Journalists seem to be a bit shy of a shilling. John Norton was a up and coming, need more like him. I wonder what happened to him.”
by davendogs
Saturday, March 16 2013, 7:11AM
“Could be a case of burying other articles in the back pages. The paper version is at the newsagents for 5am, printed out of town, I think it is Leicester. At best the news is yesterday or beyond. Journalists seem to be a bit shy of a shilling. John Norton was a up and coming, need more like him. I wonder what happened to him.”