Officer encourages drivers to take part in speed limit consultation

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, August 09, 2012
Profile image for Grimsby Telegraph

Grimsby Telegraph

"I'VE seen the devastation speeding can cause - don't think it isn't a problem."

That is the message from Humberside Police's casualty reduction officer to anyone tempted to break speed limits.

  1. SAFER ROADS:    PC Barry Gardner is urging people to take part in a public consultation on speed limits.   Picture: Jon Corken

    SAFER ROADS: PC Barry Gardner is urging people to take part in a public consultation on speed limits. Picture: Jon Corken

PC Barry Gardner is encouraging people to take part in a public consultation on limits on our roads, as latest casualty statistics are revealed.

In the past year, there was a slight reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured in car accidents in North East Lincolnshire, decreasing to 27 from 29.

BLINDS & CURTAINS MADE 2 MEASURE WE COVER SCUNTHORPE & GRIMSBY...

Grimsby Sunblinds

View details

Print voucher

Have a look at our website and view our fantastic new blinds! then you could book a free home visit were we show you more samples and help you choose your new blinds.www.grimsby-sunblinds.co.uk

Contact: 01472 809887

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

The number of collisions which caused slight injuries remained the same, at 170.

As reported, motorists are being invited to have their say on the speed management strategy for North East Lincolnshire, which is seeking to cut speed limits on a number of key routes.

Two of those – the A180, in Grimsby, and stretches of the A18 – could be reduced to 50mph.

Other roads have been identified as speeding hotspots and could have mobile speed cameras in position to catch motorists.

The deadline to have your say in writing has been extended to August 17.

PC Gardner said: "The aim is not to catch drivers out; the aim is to deter drivers from exceeding limits in the first instance, therefore making the roads a safer place.

"There is a potential for further areas of North East Lincolnshire to have mobile camera enforcement.

"If and when there are additional speed cameras deployed around the area as a matter of routine, then that area will be well publicised in the Telegraph and motorists will receive warnings that there may well be cameras in the vicinity."

The speed reduction consultation has been criticised by Keith Peat, a former police traffic officer and Lincolnshire's co-ordinator for the British Drivers' Association.

He said: "Speed cameras miss the objective; we should focus on other problems rather than being obsessed with speed.

"Speeding can't cause accidents. The cameras do not help monitor road safety because they cannot see the causes of accidents.

"I think if a dangerous area is identified, sort it out rather than install a speed camera.

"The cause should be identified rather than snapping away at the speed of the vehicle.

"The positive effects are exaggerated because cameras do not stop accidents and sometimes cause them instead."

But PC Gardner said research had been carried out on the worst areas in the borough to identify the routes where speed is excessive.

He replied: "I would like to take the person who says speeding can not cause accidents to the scene of some of the collisions I have attended over the years and see what they have to say having seen the devastation it can cause."

He said he listened to certain pressure groups who campaign against cameras and speed enforcement and who say that road safety groups should focus on other issues.

PC Gardner added: "We do focus on all aspects of road safety, we enforce drink/drug drive legislation, mobile phone legislation, careless/dangerous driving issues and non compliance of seat belts rigorously.

"We are constantly evaluating areas that show up as collision hot spots and with limited funds trying to engineer our roads safer.

"Speed enforcement plays a small but important part in our attempts to make the roads safer for everyone."

The officer said he was particularly keen to see speed reduction on the A180 from Moody Lane to Lockhill roundabout restricted to 50mph.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for muff10

    by muff10

    Sunday, August 12 2012, 7:45PM

    “HI WRANGLER,is it about DAWDLING along at 60 mph or is it about SPEEDING along at 70 mph.I cant understand your take on this.Also,normally on here when somebody has a pop at someones spelling mistakes it means they have lost the argument.(in your case a sore loser)PLEASED YOU`VE GONE GOODBYE”

  • Profile image for Rugrat1973

    by Rugrat1973

    Saturday, August 11 2012, 11:52AM

    “I think that the speed limits on the A180 and the A18 should remain at 60, given that a reduction to 50 will cause HGV to reduce their speed to 40 increasing the risks of dangerous overtaking.

    I feel that the speed limits ought to be reduced on some of the residential streets where double parking is common place and the risk of injury to children crossing the roads is high. There also ought to be more effort made to Police 20 zones around schools in the mornings and evening's as within these zones the speed limit is rarely adhered too. The Police are missing out on a gold mine!

    As for major routes through the town leave them well alone we need to keep traffic flowing!”

  • Profile image for a2011

    by a2011

    Saturday, August 11 2012, 11:45AM

    “I'm OUT, you say.

    Well it looks as though I got my assessment right and I hope you are OUT if that means you're handing your licence in, which would be to the benefit of us all on the roads.

    One 'clueless' less on the roads is reason to celebrate.”

  • Profile image for TheWrangler

    by TheWrangler

    Saturday, August 11 2012, 10:56AM

    “Well once you've Google it to find out what it means, its easier to copy and paste to get the correct spelling - derr!

    I'm not sure I have ever seen a post before containing so many WRONG's

    In the words of Duncan Bannatyne:

    "You clearly have no idea what you are talking about and are too dim witted to enter into a debate with - its like banging my head against a brick wall, which is where I hope you end up in your car after a drunk driver takes you out having failed to realise ' blah blah blah, it's all about thinking distance' - I'm OUT"”

  • Profile image for a2011

    by a2011

    Saturday, August 11 2012, 9:24AM

    “@Wrangler, Sedgepeat's knight in gleaming wasted horsepower.

    No, you don't understand but will always spout the same old rhetoric but endorsing (think about it) what I've written. Get the speed down, as has been the case on the Laceby Bypass and accident rates will come down. Leave it to the police and the sensible drivers to deal with the ignorant and atrocious on our roads.

    Your stereotypical boy racers are not the problem, I think I barely see any. However, I see through my rearview mirror plenty of a group to which I think you belong and that is the pot bellied, grey and balding tailgating know-alls, who've spent most of their retirement package buying wasted horsepower. They struggle with a supermarket trolley but then think they should be allowed to drive without inhibition because they've paid for it. Just think that their top of the range braking systems are wasted as their thinking distance increases along with the porosity of their brain tissue and that is so evident on our roads today as is the slow thinking of the educationally challenged who spout on this forum with 'empty headed authority'.

    It's a good job the road traffic engineers are switched on though eh.

    I don't want to go on 'ad nauseam' but you don't even get the boring stuff you continually spout right……..Yawn.”

  • Profile image for TheWrangler

    by TheWrangler

    Saturday, August 11 2012, 8:06AM

    “@2011

    Enough already with the thinking and breaking distance thing - it is, for the most part, completely irrelevant and the fact that you cannot see that is most disturbing.

    Yes everybody understands the concept, its very simple and self evident, but it is not applicable to 80-90% of the accidents which are driver error.

    Driver error is not about thinking time or breaking distance (persay), its about poor education of roadcraft, its about lack of concentration, its about falling into bad habits whilst driving, its about distractions inside and outside the car, its about not observing the current road condition, its about lack of focus, its about being in a rush, its about being impatient, etc.

    How is it relevant for all the single vehicle crashes where people are driving too fast for the road or road conditions?

    How is it relevant for the person texting on the mobile phone, who is not even watching the road?

    How is it relevant for the intoxicated or drugged?

    How is it relevant for the boy racers (and I include the growing number of girls in that category)?

    Ad Nausium...

    Yawn!”

  • Profile image for a2011

    by a2011

    Friday, August 10 2012, 11:27PM

    “@Sedgepeat

    You're all bluster, go on, admit it, you are incapable of mastering the concept of 'Thinking Distance' aren't you and there lies the problem with the driving on our roads.

    Road safety needs to be firmly in the hands of the road traffic engineers because they are intelligent."”

  • Profile image for Sedgepeat

    by Sedgepeat

    Friday, August 10 2012, 11:02PM

    “'Intelligent' Muff? Oh what degree teaches expert driving, dealing with accidents, reporting them and prosecuting them? Also add, in my case, fully indentured motor engineer and motorcyclist too so always professionally involved with driving & vehicles. But how does a Highways Engineer decide driving issues exactly? He should stick to designing roads and layouts. In any case he will not be prosecuting so specialist police should satisfy for themselves before doing so. In any case most limits are in response to parochialism and loca politics. How can we have a national infrastructure governed by parochialism & local aspiration anyway?

    John Siddle of Lincolnshire Road Safety Partnership blurted out on BBC Humberside in response to me, that he has no idea how the limits are set 'it is not the police's function'. So police are pointing cameras, prosecuting people, sending them on coercive courses, run by private companies for profit with other non-expert tutors who do not tell the truth on the subject and and have no idea why they are doing it! You think all this deception is fine do you?

    Why shouldn't police make a point of doing speed limit surveys in their area to satisfy themselves that a prosecution is just.

    Yes I ignore the red. Who can argue about how a queue is formed, the offence of ignoring it and that it will lead to overtake scenarios. Only fools will make red from that self evident observation. That they do so at the expense of good road safety is a matter for their conciences.”

  • Profile image for TheWrangler

    by TheWrangler

    Friday, August 10 2012, 9:40PM

    “Get rid of air bags, get rid of seat belts, get rid of ABS, remove the safety cells and ABS.

    Stick a 12" razor sharp metal spike in the centre of everyone's steering wheel and see how fast people decide to drive for themselves!”

  • Profile image for TheWrangler

    by TheWrangler

    Friday, August 10 2012, 9:36PM

    “Spot on Sedgepeat!

    Ignore the red, it just mean you have muff etal against the ropes and undertaking multiple votes.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article