Ofgem's plans to simplify energy tariffs: Q&A

Trusted article source icon
Friday, October 19, 2012
Profile image for This is Grimsby

This is Grimsby

Energy suppliers will be forced to tell customers about the cheapest gas and electricity tariffs they offer and make their bills easier to understand, under plans being floated by energy regulator Ofgem.

Following days of confusion surrounding Prime Minister David Cameron’s energy policy, Ofgem has announced it is consulting on plans for a package of “simpler, clearer, fairer measures to improve radically the competitiveness of the household energy market”.

  1. Bill

    Under Ofgem's plans, energy suppliers will have to make bills easier to understand

What changes will be brought in and how will they affect you? Find out with our Q&A.

What’s it all about?

BLINDS & CURTAINS MADE 2 MEASURE WE COVER SCUNTHORPE & GRIMSBY...

Grimsby Sunblinds

View details

Print voucher

Have a look at our website and view our fantastic new blinds! then you could book a free home visit were we show you more samples and help you choose your new blinds.www.grimsby-sunblinds.co.uk

Contact: 01472 809887

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

As it stands, many customers find it extremely difficult to decipher their bill and work out if they are on the cheapest tariff available.

The huge number of tariffs on offer from different providers – which vary depending on where you live, your method of payment and so on – make shopping around confusing, so many customers don’t bother to switch.

Research from consumer group Which? indicates only one in 10 people are able to find the cheapest deal.

Ofgem has today announced plans to tackle this issue, vowing to implement measures that will simplify tariffs.

The need for simplification has become more evident after price rises were announced by energy suppliers one week ago.

What does Ofgem intend to do?

The regulator’s proposals for consultation include:

- Limiting the number of tariffs suppliers can offer to four “core” tariffs: That will actually mean four tariffs per fuel type (electricity and gas), which would apply to each payment type. If suppliers participate in collective switching they will be able to offer another tariff, Ofgem says.

- ‘Dead’, ‘standard’ or ‘variable’ tariffs no longer available will be banned: Suppliers will only be to keep consumers on dead tariffs if they offer them value for money. Otherwise they will be transferred to their supplier’s cheapest variable deal.

- Personalised information: Suppliers will be required to give all their customers personalised information on the cheapest tariff they offer for them.

- Simplified information: Information suppliers send to consumers to be simplified, more engaging and use standard, easy-to-understand wording.

- A pilot scheme regarding vulnerable customers: Vulnerable customers and others who haven’t switched for some time would be offered, by suppliers, a personalised estimate on the cheapest tariff from across the energy market.

- A new Tariff Comparison Rate (TCR): A TCR would be used in all suppliers’ communications to help customers compare tariffs. Ofgem is also proposing personalised estimates with customers’ usage to help them compare tariffs more accurately when switching.

- Banning price increases or other changes to fixed term tariffs: Except trackers or structured price increases set out in advance which are fully in line with consumer protection law.

- Banning suppliers from rolling customers onto further fixed term contracts without their consent

- Providing a no-exit fee and 42-day switching window before the end date to their fixed term tariff before switching to a new tariff.

- New monitoring procedures: i.e. Tracking the impact on consumers, including vulnerable consumers; monitoring the market to gauge the impact of the reforms and publishing suppliers’ performance, including complaint handling and satisfaction results.

So how will I benefit?

There are a number of advantages:

More information: You’ll be given regular information on your energy use and your forecast annual bill, so you’re armed with the information you need to compare quotes with your current deal.

The new tariff information label will provide an easy way to compare the terms and conditions of tariffs in the market on a “like for like” basis, and the jargon on your bill will be replaced with easy-to-understand wording.

And when your price changes you’ll receive clear information, telling you in pounds and pence what the new cost is likely to be.

Extra protection if you choose a fixed-term contract: For example, new rules will be introduced to ensure you receive the information you need before your current contract ends, so you can start shopping around.

Better conduct: Suppliers will be required to meet Standards of Conduct: to treat you fairly and ensure they are meeting consumers’ needs. This will cover all their dealings with you, including the information they send you as well as when you speak to them with a query or complaint.

When will these changes come into force?

Ofgem aims to start introducing its reforms by summer 2013. The regulator is legally required to go through an extensive consultation process beforehand.

Meanwhile the government is publishing its Energy Bill, which may add more measures.

Have the plans been well received?

The executive director of consumer group Which?, Richard Lloyd, broadly welcomed the proposals.

"Along with the Prime Minister's promise to ensure suppliers put their customers on their lowest tariffs, this is another big step towards helping people get the best price for their energy," he said.

"Our own research shows the market is far too complicated, with only one in 10 people able to find the cheapest deal.

"These proposals will boost customer power, making it much easier to shop around, and should increase the pressure on the energy companies to keep their prices in check."

But some criticism has been directed at the plans Caroline Flint, shadow energy and climate change secretary, said Ofgem's proposals were “only tinkering at the margins”.

Ms Flint said: “It is deeply disappointing that after spending nearly two years putting these proposals together Ofgem has once again ducked the opportunity to get tough with the energy giants.

“We need to open up the books of the energy companies, but these reforms do nothing to improve the transparency of the prices these firms charge their customers."

Meanwhile News agency Reuters noted a potential hole in the plans, reporting: “Britain's energy regulator Ofgem stopped short of forcing energy suppliers to give their cheapest tariff, a political hot potato, in measures to simplify domestic gas and electricity bills on Friday.”

What stance does the Government take on this issue?

During Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, David Cameron promised to legislate "so that energy companies have to give the lowest tariff to their customers".

Ministers at the Department for Energy and Climate Change were understood to be surprised by the announcement, while the big energy firms said they were totally unaware of the plan or of the government's intention to put it into legislation.

A Downing Street source told the Guardian it had been going on for weeks, and it was not something the prime minister said on the spur of the moment.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for railuser

    by railuser

    Sunday, October 21 2012, 8:18PM

    “these different tarriffs have in effect given the energy companies the opportunity to rip us off, for example, when a company brings out a 12 month tarriff called say saver 2011, this runs until end of 2011 they then bring out a new tarrif, saver 2012, but always always the new tarrifs never drop in price, they always go up. Ofgem are toothless and cost millons and should be scrapped”

  • Profile image for ImmArthur

    by ImmArthur

    Sunday, October 21 2012, 4:40PM

    “Or even 'you'.

    A, I”

  • Profile image for ImmArthur

    by ImmArthur

    Sunday, October 21 2012, 4:40PM

    “Seeing how many people are leaping onto their soapboxes this weekend, here's one of mine: For the finest in reaonably-priced, good-quality convenience foods, try Immingham's very own Little Italy. Be nice and tell them Arthur sent yo!

    Arthur, Immingham”

  • Profile image for lastshot

    by lastshot

    Sunday, October 21 2012, 8:34AM

    “Hey! pike, piranha, b_racuda or whoever you are today.

    Instead of rigging the ballot box (how do you do that) and doing that multiple red arrow thing, why don't you put up a sensible argument to the posts you obviously disapprove of?”

  • Profile image for lastshot

    by lastshot

    Saturday, October 20 2012, 9:29PM

    “Why traditionally is it that the initial energy units the consumer uses are more expensive? This is completely bizarre and completely takes away the incentive to economise. Isn't that the government's main concern; that we conserve our resources?

    The economising energy user is penalised by having to pay more for the majority of his KWh's, where the larger user gets more of his units at a discount.

    For the economiser you need to check out Ebico. They neither differentiate between the cost of units nor discriminate against the customer in terms of which method of payment they choose. The cost is the same no matter how they pay.”

  • Profile image for porcelainblak

    by porcelainblak

    Friday, October 19 2012, 5:18PM

    “Why doesn't this article mention people on prepayment meters in rented accommodation?

    They get absolutely no choice of tariff, and pay top price. As they pay for their power BEFORE they use it they should be the cheapest of the lot!”

  • Profile image for TheWrangler

    by TheWrangler

    Friday, October 19 2012, 4:53PM

    “I agree for the most part, but some people like a fixed tariff. Why not have only two tariffs per company

    1. Fixed rate contract for say 2 years, like a phone contract - sometimes they win, sometime the consumer wins.

    2. Variable rate contract, where there is just a single rate per unit of energy month on month, so it is always easy to compare rates like for like and shop around, driving competition directly between the companies.

    There could be minimal surcharges (at cost) for paper billing and non direct debit payments, if you choose to pay that way.

    Your right, its so complicated so that they can rip the majority of people off.”

  • Profile image for lastone

    by lastone

    Friday, October 19 2012, 4:16PM

    “There's no need for energy companies to even have the proposed 4 tariffs, let alone the current level that must average well into double figures.

    Why do they need more than one tariff?

    The only reason I can think is so they can catch out customers who are not paying attention. Energy companies have introduce a "risk element" for the customer buying their electricity and gas.This practice is more traditionally associated with stock market investment and casinos.

    I once looked into the possible benefits of changing energy suppliers with the help of those comparison web-sites. The process highlighted a substantial variation between what customers are charged and realised I'd been grossly discriminated against because of my energy supplier's tariff structure, duel fuel incentives and preferred payment method.

    Based on my annual energy consumption I was paying 90% more for my electricity than those paying by direct debit on the cheapest tariff. This price differential for effectively delivering the same product is criminal.

    The disparity between what people are charged is completely outrageous and unacceptable that one person's preferred method of payment over another can contribute massively to this difference.

    The process of choosing your energy supplier is clearly like selecting an investment product, requiring guidance from a financial advisor to steer you away from making costly decisions. The fixed rate fixed term energy tariffs mirror the approach of banks who entice customers with offers of mortgages or savings accounts with apparently favourable rates.

    Like mortgages, they are then tied in to these deals by their terms and conditions which subsequently become uncompetitive due to market trends. Or, like savings accounts, the initial benefits are wiped out because, with the customer being unaware, the deal has been superseded with the latest issue.

    With the array of deals available to the customer and their wide ranging and complex price variations, the question is raised about how prices are applied which arise from fluctuations in supply costs. For example how do the energy companies apply the recent cost increases to such a varied and complex pay structure? It appears completely illogical that as the supply costs go up there are some deals costing less. Therefore it follows that one group of customer must be subsidising another.

    It seems for the suppliers to offer and manage all these tariffs it has significant cost implications and will mean everyone is paying extra for their energy because of this.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         

        Related articles

         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article