Plans for 42 homes off Stallingborough Road in Healing given green light

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, June 07, 2012
Profile image for Grimsby Telegraph

Grimsby Telegraph

PLANS to build 42 new homes off Stallingborough Road in Healing have been given the green light.

North East Lincolnshire Council's planning committee yesterday approved the application by Land Developers (Lincs) Ltd at the second time of asking.

  1. On site: Daniel Snowden, of Ross Davy Associates, left, and Dieter Nelson, of Dieter Nelson Planning Consultants, at the site off Stallingborough Road, Healing which has planning permission for 42 new homes. Picture: Jon Corken

    On site: Daniel Snowden, of Ross Davy Associates, left, and Dieter Nelson, of Dieter Nelson Planning Consultants, at the site off Stallingborough Road, Healing which has planning permission for 42 new homes. Picture: Jon Corken

  2. How it will look:  A site plan of the proposed 42-home development off Stallingborough Road, in Healing.

    How it will look: A site plan of the proposed 42-home development off Stallingborough Road, in Healing.

The proposal had come before the committee in April, but a decision was deferred to allow further negotiations between planning officers and the developers.

The revised application includes a reduction in the number of homes from 43 to 42, a green, a more uniform design of housing and a more meandering road layout to calm traffic.

BLINDS & CURTAINS MADE 2 MEASURE WE COVER SCUNTHORPE & GRIMSBY...

Grimsby Sunblinds

View details

Print voucher

Have a look at our website and view our fantastic new blinds! then you could book a free home visit were we show you more samples and help you choose your new blinds.www.grimsby-sunblinds.co.uk

Contact: 01472 809887

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

The development, which will be built on the edge of Healing immediately behind existing houses along Stallingborough Road, will comprise a mixture of one and two-storey detached and semi-detached houses.

Planning officers recommended approval of the development, saying that although it constituted a departure from the council's local plan, it could be justified by the need to increase housing supply in the borough.

However, they also recommended a Section 106 Agreement which would ensure:

At least 20 per cent of the homes are allocated "affordable housing".

The developer makes a contribution to provide additional primary school facilities to meet the expected increase in demand.

The developer carries out an ongoing landscaping maintenance programme for at least ten years.

The development was approved by seven votes to three. No residents were at the planning meeting yesterday.

Councillor Philip Jackson (Conservative, Waltham), who voted in favour of the application, said: "It's good to see there have been fruitful negotiations between our officers and developers. Most of the concerns have been resolved. We have got some far more attractive and interesting housing designs now, the road has been redesigned to provide a more interesting layout and some traffic calming measures.

"It will provide a lot of local employment and add to the supply of housing that the local area is able to provide. On balance I think it is now an acceptable application."

Daniel Snowden, of architects Ross Davy Associates, said: "It is fantastic news for all involved. We have worked closely with the planning department and Healing Parish to achieve a development which will provide a variety of homes within landscaped surroundings."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for StanleyF

    by StanleyF

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 11:57PM

    “para_handy, I'm not sure what your point is regarding Millenium? Do you mean that no new houses should be built because their owners are at risk of death? Are current Healing residents immune to the effects of Titanium tetrachloride?

    Many of the jobs in the area are in Stallingborough, Immingham and Killinghome. Living in the town centre is not ideal for travelling to these places. Surely those workers should be allowed the opportunity to move closer to work?

    As long as the infrastructure is in place and the planning polices are adhered to, I do not see there being a problem with this. What would be the point in building new homes on the Birds Eye site if nobody wants to buy them? Builders are in the business to make money, and they are more likely to sell homes on the outskirts of town than in the centre.

    It is human nature to want to 'better' yourself. You start off in the town centres and you move out to the suburbs and villages as you become more comfortable financially. You want to give your kids a better education, you move to the catchment area of the best schools. It's called social mobility and it's something that has given ordinary working class people the potential for a better life. Why should living in a village or being near a successful school only be for those living down the Avenue or in the more established areas of the village?”

  • Profile image for para_handy

    by para_handy

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 11:28PM

    “The centre of Healing is only 2·49 miles from a large storage facility containing both Chlorine and Titanium-tetra-Chloride. In the industrial history of the Humber bank, no other industrial facility has had such a long HSE stop and remediation order due to loss of control of hazardous substances.

    It has been said time and again, why let the heart of Grimsby die and become derelict? Brown field sites already have all the major utilities and road infrastructure....AND ARE BEST LOCATED FOR LOW COST HOUSING OR REFURBISHMENT, without forcing low income families to have travel difficulties getting to shops etc.

    NELC plc have a hidden agenda of spoiling all the villages by promoting green field development against the wishes of most villagers, and at the same time willingly allowing the town of Grimsby to deteriorate into slums and wasteland, why?

    NELC plc do not serve the electorate; preferring to carry out their own self serving policies, in the main, against the wishes of those they purport to serve. Grimsby all over, spoil all that is good and people are proud of and coincidentally allow the inner town decay to worsen.”

  • Profile image for zombie99

    by zombie99

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 9:21PM

    “more lego house on clonville , walking round healings new estates is like been in a bad dream wheres there s no escape.”

  • Profile image for Eileen_Dover

    by Eileen_Dover

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 7:23PM

    “@233martin - Totally agree with your comment regarding brown field sites in Grimsby. However there is a headlong rush in trying to develop more and more sites in the villages surrounding Grimsby, why? Because developers don't think there is enough profit in building houses in Grimsby itself. Someone has bought a field for next to nothing, and can build on it far more easily. What sort of strain does that put on the infrastructure of the villages, they need to upgrade water sewage and power utilities. Then there will be a call to upgrade the road, so there's a four lane highway so they can get in and out of town as fast as possible. There should be a moratorium on further village developments until all brown field sites are all used.”

  • Profile image for 233martin

    by 233martin

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 6:46PM

    “NoToTheVillageHall
    There are more than enough brown field sites around Grimsby and Cleethorpes that should take priority in there development instead of taking away two horse paddocks. The prime example is ladysmith road where it has planning permission for over 100 houses for the last 4 years but they won't develop that because it is too costly and not profitable. Also the 20 % of affordable housing is not actually on this site it is a contribution towards regenerating somewhere else ! They are only building high revenue houses.”

  • Profile image for Eileen_Dover

    by Eileen_Dover

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 4:09PM

    “At least 20 per cent of the homes are allocated "affordable housing" - Affordable to who I wonder?”

  • Profile image for markandhelen

    by markandhelen

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 3:32PM

    “The problem for these residents is not the plans, but the implementation of them. The nearby story in relation to breach of plans is a classic example. The houses were built in the wrong place and the application was granted around landscaping which was taken out -not added to. It has taken 3 long years of badgering the council to finally get some action. According to the chief executive of the council "there is no exact location for property on plans" and the council "are not responsible for the implementaion of plans"- this only happens if you pursue the council to act and if they decide that they want to.BEWARE”

  • Profile image for ImmArthur

    by ImmArthur

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 2:17PM

    “It will bring life back into the stuffy old place too. Make it a place to cruise through in a Corsa or a Saxa sharing one's bass line with everybody, rather than drive sedately through in a Rover 75, hoping not to wake the dead! Ah, such joy!

    Rarely has a thread brought me such unalloyed delight!!!!

    Arthur, Immingham”

  • Profile image for oOrotavatorOo

    by oOrotavatorOo

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 2:15PM

    “42 new homes!!! At this rate Healing will be needing a new village hall.........”

  • Profile image for Shenfield

    by Shenfield

    Thursday, June 07 2012, 2:03PM

    “Is healing becoming the new great Coates ?
    I would have thought new houses would have been more welcome than the cannabis farm of healing manor ?
    Ha ho”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article