Residents feel 'cheated' and 'ignored' over plan for 42 homes off Stallingborough Road in Healing

Trusted article source icon
Monday, June 18, 2012
Profile image for Grimsby Telegraph

Grimsby Telegraph

DISGRUNTLED Healing residents have accused North East Lincolnshire Council of "railroading" a planning application to build 42 new homes in the village.

As reported, the proposed development off Stallingborough Road was approved by seven votes to three at a recent planning committee meeting.

  1. Against plans: Stallingborough Road residents in Healing, from left, Chris Dunton, Martin Young, Stephanie Young, Joan Nesbitt, Susan Hewson, David Hewson and Alan Nesbitt are opposing the development plans to build 42 new homes in the village.

    Against plans: Stallingborough Road residents in Healing, from left, Chris Dunton, Martin Young, Stephanie Young, Joan Nesbitt, Susan Hewson, David Hewson and Alan Nesbitt are opposing the development plans to build 42 new homes in the village.

  2. A site plan of the proposed development.

    A site plan of the proposed development.

But villagers Alan Nesbitt and Martin Young, who both objected to the plans, intend to make a formal complaint about the authority's handling of the application.

They are angry that the planning meeting took place just a day after the deadline for comments on the revised application – and on the first working day after the Diamond Jubilee Bank Holiday weekend.

NEED A NEW BOILER ?. THEN READ OUR REVIEWS & CALL P & P PLUMBING...

P&P Plumbing & Heating services

View details

Print voucher

IF YOUR LOOKING AT REPLACING YOUR BOILER, THEN CALL, P & P PLUMBING. WE CAN SUPPLY & FIT BOILERS, TO SUIT ALL BUDGETS, & THEY COME WITH 3, 5, 7 & AN AMAZING 10 YEARS PARTS & LABOUR GUARANTEE.

Terms: Ts & Cs apply

Contact: 01472 803004

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

The pair, who both attended the planning meeting in April when the original 43-home application was discussed, were not at last Wednesday's meeting as they had not expected it to be held so soon after the deadline.

Mr Nesbitt, 69, of Stallingborough Road, said: "How can they conceivably have a meeting on June 6 when the deadline for responses was June 5? I know NELC says that it is not obliged to tell us when it is going to happen but you don't expect them to have the meeting the day after the bank holiday deadline.

"We feel very disappointed to say the least – cheated even."

The pair also questioned why planning officer Ian Trowsdale's report stated that no further comments to the revised plans had been received from residents, when the council's own website details 11 such responses.

In addition, Mr Young, 41, also of Stallingborough Road, claims he posted a comment a couple of days before the deadline which has not been uploaded onto the website.

Mr Nesbitt said: "We feel our points were ignored at the first meeting and the revised plans were rushed through so quickly that they didn't even register all the residents' comments."

Mr Young said: "We feel that the process has not been dealt with fairly. It's been railroaded."

The pair also expressed their disappointment that Healing Parish Council had not discussed the application at one of its regular monthly meetings, but at a specially arranged planning meeting on May 24, which they were both unaware of.

However, parish clerk Kathy Nunn said the extra meeting was arranged to ensure that the parish council met its 21-day deadline for submitting responses to planning applications.

She said: "The meeting was clearly advertised in the post office window more than five days before. In fact, we had around 12 or 13 residents at the meeting because there were a couple of other contentious planning applications on the agenda."

'Development will provide clear benefits and job opportunities'

SENIOR officers from North East Lincolnshire Council's development team have pledged to contact the disgruntled residents to speak to them about their concerns.

Jason Longhurst, head of development at North East Lincolnshire Council, said: ''I am sorry to hear that some local residents feel dissatisfied about a recent Planning Committee decision. As a result I have asked a senior member of my team to contact Mr Nesbitt and Mr Young."

He said that after the decision on the application was deferred for further negotiations in April, revised plans were submitted and NELC wrote to residents to ask for their comments.

He said: "The monthly cycle of Planning Committee meetings means that we sometimes do have meetings close to a bank holiday.

Regardless of this though, the committee was made fully aware of representations received, including those from both Mr Nesbitt and Mr Young, who both objected to the scheme."

Planning consultant Dieter Nelson, who prepared the planning application on behalf of Land Developers (Lincs) Ltd, said: "The detailed planning committee report prepared by NELC clearly dealt with all the material planning issues including sustainability, housing supply, density, layout and residential amenity and the conclusion was that the revised proposal fully accords with both national and local planning policies.

"The Section 106 legal agreement requires the developer to provide a significant education contribution, 20 per cent of the dwellings will be secured for affordable housing and a large area of open space will be dedicated to the parish council.

"The development will provide clear benefits to the area, including job opportunities for local trades people in these times of economic depression."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for markandhelen

    by markandhelen

    Monday, June 18 2012, 12:51PM

    “This will be just the beginning- i have fought the planning dept for 3 years. The planning committee is guided by the planning dept- foxes looking after the chickens. The planning dept are guided by the government who want to build new homes, so they have to make it work one way or another. They will chose when to use legislation and when to use "commom sense".
    When the plans are passed , the planning dept then leave the developer to go wild until someone complains and then they can chose whether to follow the complaint or "work by negotiation with the developer". Breaches in the planning approval can be followed up or not.
    So, my advice is complain to the highest levels and make a nuisance before they are built- they will not take them down when they are built”

  • Profile image for TheWrangler

    by TheWrangler

    Monday, June 18 2012, 11:21AM

    “I think the residents from Stallingborough Road adjacent have a ligitamate complaint.

    But is it not a little rich for people off the 'new' estate to be objecting when the estate is extended? Afterall I'm sure the residents a little further down Stallingborough Road, into Healing, were none to happy when those homes were built up against their fences!”

  • Profile image for NoToTheVillageHall

    by NoToTheVillageHall

    Monday, June 18 2012, 10:34AM

    “Nice one Mike, I'm all for progress, just not where the costs totally outweigh the benefits. Surely there is nothing wrong with that?

    It's quite clear in this case that the planning process has been manipulated to favour the developers, but wasn't that something the Tories promised in their manifesto?

    I think the planning process should be changed to include an element that requires the applicant to explain the need for the new build or change to premises. How many homes are for sale in Grimsby now? There are 33 houses for sale in Healing as I write this comment (according to the internet), is there are requirement for more?

    We all want to see the Housing Market become buoyant, but the only thing that's going to do that is a heavy reduction in house prices and the banks demanding lower deposits. At a time of low interest rates people are happy to let their home sit on the market for ever so the normal rules of supply and demand do not fit with the current housing situation.”

  • Profile image for C_orse

    by C_orse

    Monday, June 18 2012, 9:56AM

    “"But villagers Alan Nesbitt and Martin Young, who both objected to the plans, intend to make a formal complaint about the authority's handling of the application."

    Don't think that's going to worry them (they'll probably laugh). Remember the council will be investigating itself. If they've made up their mind a formal complaint will be nothing but a mild inconvenience to them.”

  • Profile image for gwenny222

    by gwenny222

    Monday, June 18 2012, 9:54AM

    “You call concreting over vast swathes of our countryside 'progress' do you??”

  • Profile image for C_orse

    by C_orse

    Monday, June 18 2012, 9:50AM

    “"Development will provide clear benefits and job opportunities"

    "The development will provide clear benefits to the area, including job opportunities for local trades people in these times of economic depression."

    That's right NELC, whenever you get faced with criticism, just ignore the issue and turn it around to your own agenda.”

  • Profile image for Mike__Hunt

    by Mike__Hunt

    Monday, June 18 2012, 9:12AM

    “Ha Ha
    Get "NoToTheVillageHall to sort it for you. He is great at stopping progress.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article