'Upset at way workers were brought in'

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Profile image for This is Grimsby

This is Grimsby

UNION bosses are calling for more transparency from foreign firms in the wake of the protests at the Total Lindsey Oil Refinery.

At a meeting at Blundell Park yesterday, Unite bosses praised Acas for its report into the strikes at the refinery – but called for an official review of the current guidelines on the EU Posting of Workers Directive.

The directive governs regulations concerning EU workers employed in other EU states – such as the workers from Italian firm IREM. It makes sure basic worker rights and practices are adhered to.

As reported, North Killingholme became the centre of national and international media attention last month as hundreds of contractors at Lindsey Oil Refinery downed tools in an illegal walkout – angry that a contract on the site had been awarded to IREM over British companies.

Protests and talks were held over several days to resolve the bitter row, escalating when, in a show of solidarity, contractors around the UK also downed tools.

The row lasted until February 5, when protesters voted at a meeting to accept Total's proposals to create more than 100 new jobs.

Yesterday, representatives from Unite, the GMB, IREM, Jacobs (main contractor) and the Engineering Construction Industry Association (ECIA) discussed the report published by Acas for more than three hours.

Speaking of the LOR/IREM issue, Unite spokesman Bernard MaCauley said: "We are not interested in the tendering process as that was all fine, but we are upset at the way the workers were brought in.

"We were told by IREM that they were their own core workers, but we have evidence to show that they were agency workers hired by IREM.

"We know this is again legal, but what should happen is that this is all above board and clear to every party.

"For example, I believe they should be accountable to an independent financial assessment, so that payroll occurs in the country they are working in and this would mean British workers could compete on an even playing field with all other EU workers.

"Transparency breeds trust and confidence and this is why we are calling for a review of the post workers directive."

Cleethorpes and Immingham MP Shona McIsaac said: "The Acas report does confirm that unions were in negotiation with IREM at the end of last year and beginning of this year.

"This is a massive construction project. There were always going to be more jobs on the site that people could apply for.

"However, the disputes did reveal that there is tension and confusion around the directive and its application to construction work in the UK.

"Ministers and MEPs have said that they would examine the issues relating to the directive."

4
Tweet this article
Report

4 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Grimsby

    by Neil, Cleethorpes

    Wednesday, February 18 2009, 4:19PM

    “Bearing in mind what I told you recently Jo.Has it crossed your mind why I didn't comment on this issue.Yup! Done EU wide negotiations as well...”

  • Profile image for This is Grimsby

    by JO, Grimsby

    Wednesday, February 18 2009, 3:49PM

    “I'm still not convinced there wasn't a fiddle going on. There was no way they could transport 200 men to Grimsby, provide full board & lodge, bus them to work and back every day, provide holiday pay etc etc, ..then fly them all home at the end of the job and *still* pay the men the going rate.

    And I don't believe for a moment that the Portugese were 'better qualified' or more productive either.

    There was a fiddle .. there had to be.”

  • Profile image for This is Grimsby

    by Jimbo, Grimsby

    Wednesday, February 18 2009, 10:53AM

    “Which all goes to show that the demonstrators were either mislead by somebody or refused to accept the truth of the situation. Either way the first part of the action was very much a xenophobic rant by several demonstrators which was only smoothed over when the union got officially involved.

    The union may be right - the law definitely needs to be looked at but the fact is that firms will try to save money whatever protestors say. If they can't do it in the UK they will do it somewhere else and that will mean unemployment for regular local workers.”

  • Profile image for This is Grimsby

    by JON, Immingham

    Wednesday, February 18 2009, 10:09AM

    “For once ms McIsaac is correct,the unions were in negotiation for the IREM workers as mr MaCauley clearly stated to the world at large on TV that he negotiated their terms and conditions including their tea breaks - what more transparency does he need??”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article