“BROKEN BRITAIN UNDER TORIES – CAMERON STICHING BRITAIN UP LIKE A KIPPER
Cameron has now got in place Police Commissioner's his Political watchdog within the service .
He is now getting his new Justice Bill through its stages to totally sew up any loose ends concerning Democracy as we now know it .The Police Service has been refused the right for strike action but the Police Federation will ballot its members in the near future on the Right to Strike .
What are Cameron/Miliband actually agreeing on with this Bill and why .The pair have already agreed on all the draconian Welfare Rights we had .The Law Society and the Bar Council are opposed to the Bill because it proposes Secret Hearings within Civil Courts solely by Ministerial decree Miliband totally goes along with it because it will cover up all the indiscretions of Blair/Straw now emerging from Libya and over Iraq .It's a case of you scratch my back I'll scratch yours hence no opposition on Welfare Reform .We would not get to know about NHS Deaths and many other malpractices .Life in Britian now is just a game between 650 players ,the Public are just a necessary interference to be ignored . http://tinyurl.com/9ssygmt”

“Well said elmswood33...”

“Wait until Cameron gets his way with the Justice & Security Bill - what it says should happen ,and what actually happens are two different things - nothing is for the benefit of the Public ,@we are a tolerable thorn and shall be ignored'
http://tinyurl.com/9ssygmt”

“Re, Commissioners "Decision Notice"

http://tinyurl.com/c939y7k

"...5. On 10 January 2012 the Council responded stating that it did not hold the information requested in both part one and two of the request.

6. On the same day the complainant requested an internal review.

7. The review, which was provided on 12 January 2012, upheld the original response. In respect of part 2 of the request the Council referred the complainant to a named firm of bailiffs who it advised may hold this information.

8. The complainant provided information to the Council which he considered demonstrated that the Council did have access to the requested information.

9. On 16 July 2012 the Council confirmed to the Commissioner that it did not hold information within the scope of the request.

10. On 3 April 2012 the complainant contacted the Commissioner to complain about the Council's response.

11. Following the Commissioner's questioning the Council found that information within the scope of the request was held and subsequently amended its refusal notice on 3 August 2012. The Council now sought to refuse part 2 of the request under section 12 (Cost of compliance)..."


How does the Freedom of Information Act work then? If the public body doesn't want to release information, it just makes up stories or cites possible exemptions until the regulating body allows the authority to withhold it.

Doesn't the fact that they are withholding potential evidence of crime interest the Information Commissioner?”

“I take it this is the Information Commissioner's decision notice:

http://tinyurl.com/azvtemf

And this, the Tribunal Judge's decision notice:

http://tinyurl.com/blxhk7f

That is a result in as much as the Tribunal Judge virtually agreed. The only thing that halted the appeal was that the council would never admit,or put in writing that it had a policy to lie and obstruct.”